Daniil Sarksian vs Zhengyu Sun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Aug at 05:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Sarksian vs Z. Sun

 RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sarksian 1 - 0 Sun
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniil Sarksian winning 2 and Zhengyu Sun winning 0. The last match between Daniil Sarksian and Zhengyu Sun was at the M15 Maanshan, 19-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Daniil Sarksian getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Sarksian | 1 | 
| Sun | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Maanshan(08-19-25)
D. Sarksian vs Z. Sun H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 40.35% (23-34) | Career Total W/L | 35.42% (17-31) | 
| 1 | Indoor | 0 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
D. Sarksian vs Z. Sun Match Preview:
- In recent form, Sarksian's second serve performance (42.45%) slightly surpasses Sun's (42.29%). Could this small advantage impact the match's outcome?
 - Regarding return game stats, Sun excels in winning opponent's second serve points with 46.47%, whereas Sarksian is at 45.05%.
 - Sarksian is more effective in returning first serves, winning 30.23% of these points compared to Sun’s 28.11%.
 - Under pressure, Sun, with a 48.15% breakpoint saving rate, seems more resilient than Sarksian, who saves at 46.81%.
 - Sarksian has a marginally better match win rate over the last year (41.67%) compared to Sun (36.67%).
 - In terms of surface preference, Sarksian performs best on Clay, winning 50% of matches, while Sun has a strong preference for Indoor Hard, winning 75%.
 - Both players primarily compete in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Sarksian having a slight edge in success rate.
 - Sarksian encounters lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 499.03) than Sun, who faces a higher competition level (average rank of 168.73). How might the quality of opponents affect their confidence and performance?
 - Deciding set performance is a strong suit for Sarksian, winning 57% of these situations, whereas Sun lags with 38% wins.
 - Considering recent form, Sarksian is more efficient at converting breakpoints, with a rate of 40%, compared to Sun's 32.2%.
 
Editorial Prediction (August 18, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming tennis encounter, Sarksian displays a slight advantage in several core measures. Their superior second serve performance, when combined with a stronger ability to convert breakpoints, suggests a potential upper hand.
Despite Sun’s prowess in return games and resilience under pressure, the higher-quality opponents they've faced might also indicate a more challenging path. Sarksian's comfort in deciding sets further bolsters their prospects.
Surface preference could play a pivotal role, with Sun excelling indoors, but overall statistics suggest Sarksian may edge out based on overall head-to-head dynamics and consistency.
Therefore, considering all factors, Sarksian is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Daniil Sarksian vs Zhengyu Sun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Sarksian vs Z. Sun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 13 | Games Won | 10 | 
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 | 
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 2:12:18 | Average Match Time | 2:12:18 | 
| 57% (47/82) | 1st Serve % | 44% (36/81) | 
| 72% (34/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) | 
| 37% (13/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) | 
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) | 
| 46% (37/81) | Return Points Win % | 43% (35/82) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
D. Sarksian Recent Matches Played
Z. Sun Recent Matches Played

D. Sarksian vs Z. Sun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.35% (23/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.42% (17/31) | 
| 41.35% (55/78) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.81% (41/62) | 
| 46.34% (601/696) | Games Win/Loss | 44.35% (420/527) | 
| 37.21% (16/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (14/28) | 
| 50.00% (6/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) | 
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 121 | Aces Total | 53 | 
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 | 
| 181 | Total Double Faults | 66 | 
| 1:23:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 464.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 186.98 | 
| 58% (1846/3203) | 1st Serve % | 51% (584/1135) | 
| 65% (1204/1846) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (385/584) | 
| 45% (611/1357) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (251/551) | 
| 42% (121/290) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (42/112) | 
| 39% (1236/3164) | Return Points Win % | 39% (424/1100) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 41.07% (23/33) | Futures W/L | 35.42% (17/31) | 
| 39% (22/56) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (16/42) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 55% (11/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) | 
| 86% (21/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (17/14) | 
| 14% (21/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) | 
| 14% (36/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (31/2) |